I have updated the dialog and allowed the user to type in a relationship manually: Changes: Top Priority There is no longer a drop-down for relationships, simply a field for the user to type freeform, with greyed out text to suggest action (‘was invented by, works with etc…’) which disappears immediately on click/tab. There are also fields for websites to be added, which also has a freeform text field for the user to type a relationship. Add the text bottom left as shown, liking to http://www.liquid.info/flow.html Optional (Do if not Very Time-Consuming) The drop-down now covers the strip of Search, References etc (unless too much work) The title, which was…
-
-
Things to have relationships with in the glossary
So, we have this now in Liquid | Flow. Select text, keyboard shortcut for the menu and then simply ‘g’ for Add to Glossary. In this case I’ve added Chris: At the bottom we have this pop-up for relationships which is are so far only relationship terms for concepts. But what about for other types of entries, such as people (in the case of Chris), places, documents, things, projects, companies and so on? How should we organise the types? For example, if the entry is about a person, we should have at least these options for defining the relationship with another entry: Works with Works for Works on Created Created…
-
Christopher Gutteridge
Short Definition: Works at Southampton Universiry Long Definition: Chris is creating Liquid Space and works with Frode Hegland. This is a: person, British Tags: This terms relates to previous terms:
